Related Topics:
Facility ID: 5359WSFCNC111KE
Facility Name and Address: SAFC INC. 1101 KETTLE MORAINE TRAIL VERONA, WI 53593 Parent Company: EMD HOLDING CORP Industry: Medicinal and Botanical Manufacturing (325411) Chemical: Methanol Reports: View TRI Facility profile report for this facility View TRI Form R submissions by this facility |
|
*You can navigate within the map with your mouse. |
Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical
lchemid=0000067561
Chart Options1: |
Waste Management Comparison -
Display facility comparison report for this industry and chemical
Display facility comparison report for this parent company
Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical
Reporting Year | Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity | Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity | Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information* |
---|---|---|---|
2022 | |||
2021 |
Source Reduction:: S21: Optimized process conditions to increase efficiency[-0-4%]
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T06: Employee recommendation (under a formal company program)
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. |
Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - inventory management system and prior process optimization work Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Unable to modify many processes as methods are set |
2020 |
Source Reduction:: W50: Optimized reaction conditions or otherwise increased efficiency of synthesis
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas |
Source Reduction: Ways P2 Was Incorporated in Original Process Design - inventory management Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Past process optimization incorporated when feasible. Unable to change validated processes or when customer does not permit changes. Other Environmental Practices: Recycling - Excess unused Methanol sent to other companies for use to prevent disposal as waste. |
2019 |
Source Reduction:: W50: Optimized reaction conditions or otherwise increased efficiency of synthesis
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. |
W50: process development improvements reduced purification needs Source Reduction - project went to process development for improvements Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Prior process development efforts carry forward solvent reduction Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - many processes are either validated or customers do not permit modification |
2018 |
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. |
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Chemistry processes could be negatively impacted by solvent changes or quantity changes. Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Process development incorporates reduction in quantity or toxicity where possible during development work. |
|
2017 |
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
|
Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Minimization is designed into processes during development where feasible and permitted. Source Reduction: Source Reduction - Minimization is designed into processes during development where feasible and permitted. |
|
2016 |
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
|
Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - process development will optimize or minimize volumes during process design or re-development for processes Source Reduction: Ways P2 Was Incorporated in Original Process Design - part of process development is to optimize and minimize volumes during process design and re-development for processes |
|
2015 |
Barriers: B6-No Information B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
|
Source Reduction: Ways P2 Was Incorporated in Original Process Design - process optimization and design for new projects incorporate efforts to minimize volumes |