Related Topics:
Facility ID: 54829MCMPN1640W
Facility Name and Address: 3M CUMBERLAND 1640 WESTERN AVE CUMBERLAND, WI 54829 Parent Company: 3M CO Industry: Abrasive Product Manufacturing (327910) Chemical: Methanol Reports: View TRI Facility profile report for this facility View TRI Form R submissions by this facility |
|
*You can navigate within the map with your mouse. |
Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical
lchemid=000067561
Chart Options1: |
Waste Management Comparison -
Display facility comparison report for this industry and chemical
Display facility comparison report for this parent company
Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical
Reporting Year | Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity | Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity | Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information* |
---|---|---|---|
2019 | Source Reduction - Site continuous improvement process includes projects such as product reformulations/optimization that drives product quality improvement and reduces emissions. | ||
2018 | Source Reduction - Continuous improvement methods include product reformulation tests to improve quality and also reduce emissions. | ||
2017 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - We continuously work of reformulation efforts to reduce pollution. Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - We continuously work on process and product understanding and pollution reduction is a key part of that research, as well as maintaining or improving product quality. |
|
2016 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Source Reduction - We continue work on reformulation efforts to reduce pollutants.
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - We continue to investigate reformulation opportunities to reduce pollution, but product quality must be equal or better than existing formula. |
|
2015 |
Barriers: B3-No Information B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Source Reduction - Continued work is being done on product reformulation as a means of emission reduction. | |
2014 |
Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. |
Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Past formulation changes have been implemented to optimize quality and emission reduction. Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Formulation changes have been tried but quality testing has demonstrated present formulation as optimal. |
|
2013 |
Other Environmental Practices - 3M posts sustainability goals and documents progress relative to these goal through the pollution prevention pays program(3P)
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Product quality concerns relative to new recipes or changes in raw materials that may reduce emissions. |
||
2012 |
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - The facility continues to work on source reduction through reformulation efforts. For 2012 there was no substantial progress in this area. |
||
2006 |
Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
|