TRI Pollution Prevention Report for AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC and Dichloromethane

Facility ID: 95630GLNTT91BLU

Facility Name and Address:
AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC
91 BLUE RAVINE RD
FOLSOM, CA 95630

Parent Company: AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES INC

Industry: Analytical Laboratory Instrument Manufacturing (334516)
Chemical: Dichloromethane

Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical


lchemid=0000075092
    Waste Management Comparison - 2019



Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical


Reporting Year Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information*
2021 Other Environmental Practices - Majority of chemical use/processing is within closed systems; BACT implemented on waste end.
2020 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Majority of chemical use/processing is within closed systems; BACT implemented on waste end

2019 Source Reduction:: W42: Substituted raw materials[-15-24%]
Source Reduction:: W66: Modified or installed rinse systems[-15-24%]
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
W42: Replaced DCM with hexane
W66: New/reduced rinse processes

2018
Source Reduction: Source Reduction - Manufacturing processes are conducted via closed systems.

Source Reduction: Methods for Identifying Pollution Prevention Opportunities - Monthly inspections are conducted of areas supporting both raw chemicals and waste, including a review of existing Best Management Practices (BMPs).

2016 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
Barriers: B7-Barriers to P2 B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies.

Source Reduction: Methods for Identifying Pollution Prevention Opportunities - Facility Chemists and Environmental team meet frequently to discuss source reduction opportunities and was to reduce emissions from this chemical.

Barriers to P2: B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies. - No known chemical substitute has equaled the quality properties of the current chemical used in production.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Facility manufacturers Gas Chromatography columns and this chemical is a requirement for production. Reducing or removing the chemical would affect the performance of the column.

2015 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Other Environmental Practices: General Environmental Management - The facility continues to operate with an Environmental Management System based on ISO14001. Preventative Maintenance, Continuous Improvement and auditing continue help prevent unnecessary leaks, spills, and pollution.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - The facility manufactures general chromatography supplies for chemical analysis for the environmental, pharmaceutical and food safety industries. The products need to meet specific cleanliness and performance specs.

2014 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T03: Materials balance audits
W13: The site has improved its sampling and material Anaylsis for offsite waste shipments. This has improved the accuracy of Dicholoromethane reported for releases.

2013 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T03: Materials balance audits
*Classifications of Optional Pollution Prevention Information shown in brackets are provided by EPA.


TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary

The Waste Management Hierarchy

The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes. The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
  • Source Reduction includes activities that eliminate or reduce the generation of chemical waste.
  • Recycling includes the recovery of a toxic chemical in waste for reuse.
  • Energy Recovery includes the combustion of toxic chemicals in waste to generate heat or electricity.
  • Treatment includes the destruction of a toxic chemical in waste.
  • Disposal or Other Releases includes toxic chemical quantities entering the environment.
The PPA requires facilities to provide the following details about each chemical they report to TRI:
Facilities may also provide optional Pollution Prevention Information describing their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.