TRI Pollution Prevention Report for AMSTERDAM PRINTING & LITHO and Nitric acid

Facility ID: 12010MSTRDWALLI

Facility Name and Address:
AMSTERDAM PRINTING & LITHO
166 WALLINS CORNERS RD
AMSTERDAM, NY 12010

Parent Company:

Industry: Commercial Gravure Printing (323111)
Chemical: Nitric acid

Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical


lchemid=0007697372
    Waste Management Comparison - 2021



Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical


Reporting Year Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information*
2022 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of a business decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

2021 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of a business decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

2020 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of a business decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

2019 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of a business decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

2018 Barriers: B8-Barriers to P2 B8 - A reduction does not appear to be technically feasible

Barriers to P2: B8 - A reduction does not appear to be technically feasible - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of a business decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

2017 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Numerous discussions with upper management along with our vendors to find a product substitution for non-toxic/less toxic inputs along with the re-design of the end product. At this time there is no viable alternative substitution that would allow us to achieve the desired end. Diffusion dialysis may be feasible after a detailed evaluation also if it were to work as the technology is questionable. Projected payback is too long for serious consideration. In conclusion APL will reduce the waste stream by means of abusiness decision to reduce this product due to declining sales year after year.

*Classifications of Optional Pollution Prevention Information shown in brackets are provided by EPA.


TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary

The Waste Management Hierarchy

The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes. The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
  • Source Reduction includes activities that eliminate or reduce the generation of chemical waste.
  • Recycling includes the recovery of a toxic chemical in waste for reuse.
  • Energy Recovery includes the combustion of toxic chemicals in waste to generate heat or electricity.
  • Treatment includes the destruction of a toxic chemical in waste.
  • Disposal or Other Releases includes toxic chemical quantities entering the environment.
The PPA requires facilities to provide the following details about each chemical they report to TRI:
Facilities may also provide optional Pollution Prevention Information describing their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.