Facility ID: 15003HHRBR14THS
Facility Name and Address: METAL COATERS 500 PERTH DR - NEW ECONOMY BUSINESS PARK AMBRIDGE, PA 15003 Parent Company: NCI GROUP INC Industry: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers (332812) Chemical: Chromium compounds (except for chromite ore mined in the Transvaal Region) |
|
Reporting Year | Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity | Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity | Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information* |
---|---|---|---|
2009 | Other Environmental Practices - Centria operates an onsite coil coating line. At the end of 2006 centria installed a new thermal oxidizer to control the VOC emissions from the coating line at a cost of over 3.2 million dollars. In addition to the installation of the oxidizer, the prime and finish coating rooms were sealed to create conditions that meet the usepa criteria for permanent total enclosures. Subsequent testing revealed that the overall capture efficiency for the system was 100 % eliminating all fugitive air pollutants as all coating, mixing and cleaning takes place within the coater rooms. Furthermore, onsite source testing of the thermal oxidizer revealed that the destruction efficiency of the new system was 99. 4 %. Whereas, the previous system was rated at only 98.67 %. | ||
2008 | Other Environmental Practices - Centria operates an onsite coil coating line. At the end of 2006 centria installed a new thermal oxidizer to control the VOC emissions from the coating line at a cost of over 3.2 million dollars. In addition to the installation of the oxidizer, the prime and finish coating rooms were sealed to create conditions that meet the usepa criteria for permanent total enclosures. Subsequent testing revealed that the overall capture efficiency for the system was 100 % eliminating all fugitive air pollutants as all coating, mixing and cleaning takes place within the coater rooms. Furthermore, onsite source testing of the thermal oxidizer revealed that the destruction efficiency of the new system was 99. 4 %. Whereas, the previous system was rated at only 98.67 %. | ||
1993 |
Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures
Source Reduction:: W14: Changed production schedule to minimize equipment and feedstock changeovers |
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T03: Materials balance audits
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program) |
|
1991 |
Source Reduction:: W14: Changed production schedule to minimize equipment and feedstock changeovers
Source Reduction:: W22: Began to test outdated material - continue to use if still effective Source Reduction:: W54: Instituted better controls on operating bulk containers to minimize discarding |
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T09: Trade association/industry technical assistance program Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T09: Trade association/industry technical assistance program |
The Waste Management Hierarchy |
The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes.
The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed
by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
|