TRI Pollution Prevention Report for MCGREGOR ASSOCIATES INC and Lead

Facility ID: 45309MCGRG365CA

Facility Name and Address:
MCGREGOR ASSOCIATES INC
365 CARR DR
BROOKVILLE, OH 45309

Parent Company: MCGREGOR ASSOCIATES

Industry: Printed Circuit Assembly (Electronic Assembly) Manufacturing (334418)
Chemical: Lead

Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical


lchemid=0007439921
    Waste Management Comparison - 2020



Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical


Reporting Year Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information*
2022 Source Reduction:: S05: Modified content, grade, or purity of a chemical input[-0-4%]
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
S05: We tried mixing our lead solder, and we started replenishing with lead-free solder on refills. We found that the most we can refill with lead-free is 500# per year. Any levels greater than this will cause the lead solder purity to fail. Max monthly refill with lead-free solder is 41# per month.

Source Reduction - The machine operator asked management if he could mix the lead-free solder alloy with lead alloy. We had an excess inventory of lead-free solder that she wanted to use instead of purchasing more lead solder alloy.

Other Environmental Practices: Recycling - The dross that is developed from wave soldering is sent off-site to be reclaimed. for the year 2024, we are evaluating equipment for internal reclaiming which should reduce the amount we sent off site to be reclaimed by 80%

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Industrial controls and military products have not been allowed to use a lead-free soldering material. Tin whiskering is a major concern of product failure.

2021 Source Reduction:: S44: Other improvements to operating practices and training
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T09: Trade association/industry technical assistance program
Barriers: B1-Barriers to P2 B1 - Insufficient capital to install new source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction activities/initiat
Barriers: B4-Barriers to P2 B4 - Source reduction activities were implemented but were unsuccessful.
S44: Working with customer to remove lead and use RoHS Soldering alloy


Barriers to P2: B4 - Source reduction activities were implemented but were unsuccessful. - Customers still have concerns with Solder alloys without lead. Samples have been supplied for testing "WP".

Barriers to P2: B1 - Insufficient capital to install new source reduction equipment or implement new source reduction activities/initiat - Older equipment we run has issue with the RoHs solder. hoven heat capabilities. reduction in production do to conveyor speed

2020 Source Reduction:: W42: Substituted raw materials[-15-24%]

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
W42: Try and have customers remove the lead from assemblies by going with a leadless element. (SOLDER)

Other Barriers to Source Reduction - We are a contract manufacture and build to customer supplied prints. There is a movement for some of our consumer product customers to start using lead free solder.


Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - We build ground power support for the government Aircraft. Lead free solder is not permitted to be used.

2019 Source Reduction:: W82: Modified design or composition of product[-15-24%]

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
W82: replace lead solder with lead free solder

Source Reduction - Customers are changing to meet government guidelines
Other Environmental Practices - We are a contract manufacture and we do not own the design. However, we work with the design teams to reduce or eliminate lead in product.



Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Military need to perform further testing to remove the lead from the solder used on some of there Printed circuit boards

2018
Source Reduction: Source Reduction - Alternative assembly materials are being used were applicable.

2017
Source Reduction: Source Reduction - Customer are starting the change to remove LEAD from there assemblies.

2016 Source Reduction:: W82: Modified design or composition of product[-0-4%]
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other
W82: We are reducing the LEAD alloy content in our solder on some old product and new product. Working towards "Rohs" compliance.

Source Reduction - Product design change
2015 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Customers to redesign PCBAs to use Lead Free solder. We are the contract manufacture and build to customer prints.

2012 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Customer want lead solder. Lead free solder is not as reliable.

2006 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
2005 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
2004 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
*Classifications of Optional Pollution Prevention Information shown in brackets are provided by EPA.


TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary

The Waste Management Hierarchy

The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes. The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
  • Source Reduction includes activities that eliminate or reduce the generation of chemical waste.
  • Recycling includes the recovery of a toxic chemical in waste for reuse.
  • Energy Recovery includes the combustion of toxic chemicals in waste to generate heat or electricity.
  • Treatment includes the destruction of a toxic chemical in waste.
  • Disposal or Other Releases includes toxic chemical quantities entering the environment.
The PPA requires facilities to provide the following details about each chemical they report to TRI:
Facilities may also provide optional Pollution Prevention Information describing their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.