TRI Pollution Prevention Report for AGCO CORP. JACKSON OPERATIONS and Xylene (mixed isomers)

Facility ID: 56143GCHMQ202IN

Facility Name and Address:
AGCO CORP. JACKSON OPERATIONS
202 INDUSTRIAL PARK
JACKSON, MN 56143

Parent Company: AGCO CORP

Industry: Farm Machinery and Equipment Manufacturing (333111)
Chemical: Xylene (mixed isomers)

Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical


lchemid=0001330207
    Waste Management Comparison - 2020



Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical


Reporting Year Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information*
2022 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2022 were necessary for production.

2021 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2021 were necessary for production.

2020 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2020 were necessary for production.

2019 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2019 were necessary for production.

2018 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2018 were necessary for production.

2017 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials used during RY2017 were necessary for production.

2016 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials they used during RY2016 were necessary for production.

2015 Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.

Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - AGCO-Jackson continues to investigate low VOC, low toxic alternatives; however, the materials they used during RY2015 were necessary for production.

2012 Source Reduction:: W73: Substituted coating materials used
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
2011 Source Reduction:: W73: Substituted coating materials used
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
1998 Source Reduction:: W42: Substituted raw materials

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1997 Source Reduction:: W42: Substituted raw materials

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1996 Source Reduction:: W42: Substituted raw materials

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1995 Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1994 Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1993 Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping

Source Reduction:: W53: Use of a differant process catalyst

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
1992 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures


Source Reduction:: W24: Instituted better labeling procedures


Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources


Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T06: Employee recommendation (under a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T02: External pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T02: External pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
1991 Source Reduction:: W13: Improved maintenance scheduling, recordkeeping, or procedures


Source Reduction:: W24: Instituted better labeling procedures


Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources


Source Reduction:: W52: Modified equipment, layout, or piping

Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T06: Employee recommendation (under a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T02: External pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T02: External pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T05: Employee recommendation (independent of a formal company program)
*Classifications of Optional Pollution Prevention Information shown in brackets are provided by EPA.


TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary

The Waste Management Hierarchy

The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes. The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
  • Source Reduction includes activities that eliminate or reduce the generation of chemical waste.
  • Recycling includes the recovery of a toxic chemical in waste for reuse.
  • Energy Recovery includes the combustion of toxic chemicals in waste to generate heat or electricity.
  • Treatment includes the destruction of a toxic chemical in waste.
  • Disposal or Other Releases includes toxic chemical quantities entering the environment.
The PPA requires facilities to provide the following details about each chemical they report to TRI:
Facilities may also provide optional Pollution Prevention Information describing their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.