TRI Pollution Prevention Report for CERTIFIED ENAMELING INC and Certain glycol ethers

Facility ID: 90023CRTFD3342E

Facility Name and Address:
CERTIFIED ENAMELING INC
3342 EMERY ST
LOS ANGELES, CA 90023

Parent Company:

Industry: Metal Coating, Engraving (except Jewelry and Silverware), and Allied Services to Manufacturers (332812)
Chemical: Certain glycol ethers

Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical


lchemid=N230
    Waste Management Comparison - 2019



Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical


Reporting Year Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information*
2022 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Facility will continue evaluating additional options during RY2023 and future operating years.

2021 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Facility is evaluating additional options during RY2022 and future operating years.

2020 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Previously implemented pollution control and recycling systems. Further reductions are technologically infeasible.

2019 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
Barriers: B8-Barriers to P2 B8 - A reduction does not appear to be technically feasible
Barriers: B7-Barriers to P2 B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies.

Barriers to P2: B8 - A reduction does not appear to be technically feasible - BACT devices are in place. No known or proven technologies are available.

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Previously implemented pollution control and recycling systems. Further reductions are technologically infeasible.

Barriers to P2: B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies. - Pollution control and recycling systems are in place. Any additional reductions are technically infeasible.

2018 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas
Barriers: B7-Barriers to P2 B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies.

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Previously implemented pollution control and recycling systems. Further reductions are technologically infeasible.

Barriers to P2: B7 - No known substitutes or alternative technologies. - Pollution control and recycling systems are in place. Any additional reduction is technically infeasible.

2017 Barriers: B6-Barriers to P2 B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas

Barriers to P2: B6 - Pollution prevention previously implemented - additional reduction does not appear technically or economically feas - Pollution control and recycling systems are in place. Any additional reduction is technically infeasible.

2013 Other Barriers to Source Reduction - All the applicable waste reduction methods are already in place..

2006 Source Reduction:: W19: Other changes in operating practices
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
2005 Source Reduction:: W19: Other changes in operating practices
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
*Classifications of Optional Pollution Prevention Information shown in brackets are provided by EPA.


TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary

The Waste Management Hierarchy

The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes. The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
  • Source Reduction includes activities that eliminate or reduce the generation of chemical waste.
  • Recycling includes the recovery of a toxic chemical in waste for reuse.
  • Energy Recovery includes the combustion of toxic chemicals in waste to generate heat or electricity.
  • Treatment includes the destruction of a toxic chemical in waste.
  • Disposal or Other Releases includes toxic chemical quantities entering the environment.
The PPA requires facilities to provide the following details about each chemical they report to TRI:
Facilities may also provide optional Pollution Prevention Information describing their source reduction, recycling, or pollution control activities.