Facility ID: 95035LNRTC275SH
Facility Name and Address: ANALOG DEVICES INC 275 S HILLVIEW DR MILPITAS, CA 95035 Parent Company: ANALOG DEVICES INC Industry: Semiconductor and Related Device Manufacturing (334413) Chemical: Hydrogen fluoride |
|
Reporting Year | Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity | Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity | Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information* |
---|---|---|---|
2019 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2 - PROCESS OPTIMIZED, SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WOULD RESULT IN QUALITY DECLINE.
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - PROCESS OPTIMIZED, SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WOULD RESULT IN QUALITY DECLINE. |
|
2018 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - PROCESS OPTIMIZED, SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WOULD RESULT IN QUALITY DECLINE. |
|
2017 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - PROCESS OPTIMIZED, SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WOULD RESULT IN QUALITY DECLINE. |
|
2016 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - PROCESS OPTIMIZED, SOURCE REDUCTION ACTIVITIES WOULD RESULT IN QUALITY DECLINE. |
|
2015 |
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Source Reduction Not Applicable - Concern product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. Process is optimized. |
||
2014 |
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Source Reduction Not Applicable- Concern product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. Process is optimized. |
||
2013 |
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. Process is optimized. |
||
2012 |
Other Barriers to Source Reduction - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.Process is optimized. |
||
2007 |
Source Reduction:: W58: Other process modifications
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T06: Employee recommendation (under a formal company program)
|
|
2006 |
Source Reduction:: W14: Changed production schedule to minimize equipment and feedstock changeovers
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T04: Participative team management
|
|
2005 |
Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
|
|
2004 |
Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
|
|
2003 |
Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
|
|
2001 |
Source Reduction:: W36: Implemented inspection or monitoring program of potential spill or leak sources
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T01: Internal pollution prevention opportunity audit(s)
|
The Waste Management Hierarchy |
The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes.
The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed
by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
|