Production Related Waste Management for Selected Chemical
lchemid=0007664393
Waste Management Comparison - 2020
Pollution Prevention Activities for Selected Chemical
| Reporting Year | Section 8.10: Newly Implemented Source Reduction Activity | Section 8.10: Methods to Identify Activity | Section 8.11: Optional Pollution Prevention Information* |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - Solid waste for this material has been sent for energy recovery since 2016 Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material. |
|
| 2021 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - Solid waste for this material has been sent for energy recovery since 2016 Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material |
|
| 2020 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction in not an option for this material. Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - Solid waste for this material has been sent for energy recovery since 2016 |
|
| 2019 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - Solid waste for this material has been sent for energy recover since 2016. Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material. |
|
| 2018 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material. |
|
| 2017 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - This solid waste was able to be removed from landfill in 2016 and has been sent for energy recovery since then. Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material. |
|
| 2016 |
Barriers: B3-Barriers to P2 B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction.
|
Barriers to P2: B3 - Concern that product quality may decline as a result of source reduction. - Specific recipes for usage must be followed for this manufacturing process, source reduction is not an option for this material. Other Environmental Practices: Energy Recovery - This solid waste was able to be sent for Energy Recovery in 2016 rather than sent to landfill for disposal. |
|
| 2012 | Other Environmental Practices - In 2012 changed corrosive solid waste from landfill to waste to energy. In future years, we expect no more waste to landfill for this toxic chemical. | ||
| 2011 | Other Environmental Practices - The landfill waste is in the process of being changed to Waste to Energy, approval has been received by the state, in process of auditing site & then initiate sending material to be used for energy production to reduce waste to landfill. | ||
| 2001 |
Source Reduction:: W58: Other process modifications
|
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T06: Employee recommendation (under a formal company program)
|
|
| 1998 |
Source Reduction:: W21: Instituted procedures to ensure that materials do not stay in inventory beyond
Source Reduction:: W33: Installed overflow alarms or automatic shutoff valves Source Reduction:: W35: Installed vapor recovery systems |
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T10: Vendor assistance
Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other Methods to Identify SR Opportunities: T11: Other |
TRI Pollution Prevention Glossary
The Waste Management Hierarchy |
The waste management hierarchy established by the Pollution Prevention Act (PPA) guides waste generators toward the best options for managing wastes.
The preferred option is to prevent pollution at its source, but for waste that is generated, the preferred management methods are recycling, followed
by burning for energy recovery, treatment and, as a last resort, disposing of the waste.
|
- A breakdown of production-related waste managed. This includes all amounts of the chemical released directly to the environment or otherwise managed as waste, other than waste generated by one-time events not associated with normal production processes (e.g., fires or remedial actions).
- A production ratio or activity index to provide context for reported toxic chemical quantities. For example, if a chemical is used in the manufacture of refrigerators, the production index would track the number of refrigerators produced and could be used to help gauge how much of the chemical is being released per unit of production.
- Any newly implemented source reduction activities, reported using "W-codes" (e.g., "W41: Increased purity of raw materials")