Jump to main content or area navigation.

Contact Us

TRI Explorer

Releases: Geography State Report Click for help on this criterion

Detail columns are collapsed by default. Click the expand columns icon icon to view additional columns. Use your Browser back feature to collapse.
 

Data Source: 2022 Dataset (released October 2023) See Note     Instructions for printing wide reports


TRI On-site and Off-site Reported Disposed of or Otherwise Released (in pounds), for facilities in All Industries, for All chemicals, By County, North Carolina , 2021

Row # County Total On-site Disposal or Other Releases Total Off-site Disposal or Other Releases Total On- and Off-site Disposal or Other Releases
   
Display details on On-site Disposal to Class I Wells RCRA C Landfills and Other Landfills   Display details on Other On-site Disposal or Other Releases
Display details on Off-site Disposal to U.I. Wells RCRA C Landfills and Other Landfills   Display details on Other Off-site Disposal or Other Releases
 
 
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
1 Alamance 21,754 109,709 131,463
2 Alexander 23,243 3,735 26,978
3 Alleghany 0 250 250
4 Anson 2,318 53 2,371
5 Ashe 1,505 2 1,507
6 Beaufort 5,047,933 7,042 5,054,975
7 Bertie 2,911,652 3,434 2,915,086
8 Bladen 4,199,241 177,473 4,376,714
9 Brunswick 28,644 665,252 693,896
10 Buncombe 201,284 55,969 257,253
11 Burke 41,320 12,106 53,425
12 Cabarrus 251,142 561,262 812,404
13 Caldwell 222,419 10,674 233,093
14 Carteret 51,497 . 51,497
15 Caswell 0 . 0
16 Catawba 1,899,122 45,319 1,944,440
17 Chatham 561,788 53,559 615,347
18 Cherokee 183 0 183
19 Chowan 140,246 4 140,249
20 Cleveland 54,580 259,954 314,534
21 Columbus 3,475,240 587 3,475,827
22 Craven 825,166 3,776 828,941
23 Cumberland 1,069,878 47,748 1,117,626
24 Dare 3,318 . 3,318
25 Davidson 157,049 5,382 162,430
26 Davie 252 1 252
27 Duplin 111,751 397 112,148
28 Durham 50,006 28,033 78,039
29 Edgecombe 115,201 122 115,323
30 Forsyth 669,855 85,853 755,708
31 Franklin 56,441 4,265 60,706
32 Gaston 141,881 58,939 200,820
33 Granville 203,398 20,843 224,241
34 Guilford 256,674 68,875 325,548
35 Halifax 1,139,550 2,438 1,141,988
36 Harnett 1,510 . 1,510
37 Haywood 2,459,053 970 2,460,023
38 Henderson 161,542 191,567 353,109
39 Hertford 333,147 277,268 610,414
40 Hoke 0 . 0
41 Iredell 121,309 12,571 133,880
42 Jackson 46 2 48
43 Johnston 34,666 127,882 162,548
44 Jones 4,255 . 4,255
45 Lee 660,157 3,957 664,114
46 Lenoir 163,631 1,723 165,354
47 Lincoln 1,026 44,982 46,009
48 Macon 0 . 0
49 Madison 10 . 10
50 Martin 1,041,214 43 1,041,257
51 Mcdowell 0 15 15
52 Mecklenburg 266,260 687,248 953,508
53 Mitchell 5,513 . 5,513
54 Montgomery 155,671 26,410 182,081
55 Moore 211 11 221
56 Nash 22,414 1,507 23,921
57 New Hanover 1,755,642 1,986,039 3,741,681
58 Northampton 126,433 1,410 127,843
59 Onslow 732,845 . 732,845
60 Orange 788 6,434 7,222
61 Pasquotank 0 . 0
62 Perquimans 4 0 4
63 Person 1,454,986 389,954 1,844,940
64 Pitt 235,560 2,235 237,794
65 Randolph 78,579 132,453 211,033
66 Richmond 449,458 8,274 457,732
67 Robeson 199,209 46,883 246,092
68 Rockingham 116,687 1,004,870 1,121,557
69 Rowan 225,890 204,484 430,374
70 Rutherford 630,193 13,395,774 14,025,967
71 Sampson 41,097 47,449 88,546
72 Scotland 352,997 59,885 412,882
73 Stanly 266 13,649 13,914
74 Stokes 1,189,181 32 1,189,214
75 Surry 328,960 4,767 333,726
76 Swain 0 . 0
77 Union 41,151 102,010 143,160
78 Vance 3,985 206 4,191
79 Wake 340,364 30,186 370,550
80 Washington 3 . 3
81 Wayne 62,198 50 62,248
82 Wilkes 101,141 49,007 150,149
83 Wilson 134,428 91,930 226,358
84 Yancey 0 . 0
Total 37,969,210 21,247,192 59,216,401
Total state disposal or other releases omitting double counted amounts 57,472,085

(Note that in the table above, EPA has converted Dioxin and Dioxin-like compounds data from grams (as reported to EPA) into pounds. Please refer to the Dioxin and Dioxin-like compounds table below for reported amounts of Dioxin and Dioxin-like compounds in grams. Grams can be converted to pounds by multiplying by 0.002205.)


TRI On-site and Off-site Reported Disposed of or Otherwise Released (in grams), for facilities in All Industries, for Dioxin and Dioxin-like compounds, By County, North Carolina , 2021

Row # County Total On-site Disposal or Other Releases Total Off-site Disposal or Other Releases Total On- and Off-site Disposal or Other Releases
   
Display details on On-site Disposal to Class I Wells RCRA C Landfills and Other Landfills   Display details on Other On-site Disposal or Other Releases
Display details on Off-site Disposal to U.I. Wells RCRA C Landfills and Other Landfills   Display details on Other Off-site Disposal or Other Releases
 
 
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
sort ascending  sort descending
1 Alamance .2397000 . .2397000
2 Beaufort .1607700 . .1607700
3 Brunswick 1.6997920 . 1.6997920
4 Catawba 71.5549700 . 71.5549700
5 Columbus 11.5569100 . 11.5569100
6 Craven 1.8397000 .2918000 2.1315000
7 Forsyth 2.7863540 . 2.7863540
8 Granville .1246600 . .1246600
9 Halifax .3850800 . .3850800
10 Haywood .6411591 . .6411591
11 Hertford 1.2000000 . 1.2000000
12 Jackson .3683000 . .3683000
13 Martin 3.1217051 . 3.1217051
14 Mcdowell .2352000 . .2352000
15 Mecklenburg .4466670 . .4466670
16 Person 2.0961209 . 2.0961209
17 Rutherford .4215000 . .4215000
18 Stokes 1.6000000 . 1.6000000
Total 100.4785881 .2918000 100.7703881
Total state disposal or other releases omitting double counted amounts 101

Back to top

View other report type:
Transfers Off-site for Further Waste Management
Quantities of TRI Chemicals in Waste (waste management)

Save this report to other formats:
Save report in comma-separated-value, CSV, format
Save report in Microsoft Excel format, XLS
Save report in Rich Text Format, RTF
Open report in PDF format

Note: Reporting year (RY) 2022 is the most recent TRI data available. Facilities reporting to TRI were required to submit their data to EPA by July 1 for the previous calendar year's activities. TRI Explorer is using the 2022 Dataset (released October 2023). This dataset includes revisions for the years 1988 to 2022 processed by EPA. Revisions submitted to EPA after this time are not reflected in TRI Explorer reports. TRI data may also be obtained through EPA Envirofacts.

Users of TRI information should be aware that TRI data reflect releases and other waste management activities of chemicals, not whether (or to what degree) the public has been exposed to those chemicals. TRI data, in conjunction with other information, can be used as a starting point in evaluating exposures that may result from releases and other waste management activities which involve toxic chemicals. The determination of potential risk depends upon many factors, including the toxicity of the chemical, the fate of the chemical, and the amount and duration of human or other exposure to the chemical after it is released.

Off-site disposal or other releases include transfers sent to other TRI Facilities that reported the amount as on-site disposal or other release because not all states and/or not all industry sectors are included in this report.

For purposes of analysis, data reported as Range Code A is calculated using a value of 5 pounds, Range Code B is calculated using a value of 250 pounds and Range Code C is calculated using a value of 750 pounds.

A decimal point, or "." denotes the following: if a decimal point is reported across an entire row, the facility submitted a Form A (i.e., the facility certified that its total annual reportable amount is less than 500 pounds, and does not manufacture, process, or otherwise use more than 1 million pounds); or if a decimal point is reported in a single column, the facility left that particular cell blank in its Form R submission (a zero in a cell denotes either that the facility reported "0" or "NA" in its Form R submission).

This report may not include all counties in the state. A county may not be included in this report for two reasons: (1) there are no facilities reporting to TRI in the particular county; or (2) the facilities reporting to TRI in the particular county did not report to TRI for the user-specified selection criteria.

How to cite TRI Explorer. Following APA Style, 6th edition, an appropriate citation to TRI Explorer is:
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2024). TRI Explorer (2022 Dataset (released October 2023)) [Internet database]. Retrieved from https://enviro.epa.gov/triexplorer/, (April 24, 2024).

Go to TRI Explorer Home |

Top of Page

Jump to main content.