|Data Source: 2021 National Analysis Dataset (released October 2022)||See Note||Instructions for printing wide reports|
|TRI Transfers Off-site for Further Waste Management (in pounds), for all 24 facilities, for facilities in All Industries, for 1,3-Phenylenediamine, chemical, U.S., 2021|
|Row #||Facility||Transfers to Recycling||Transfers to Energy Recovery||Transfers to Treatment||POTW Transfers - Other Releases||POTW Transfers - Treatment||Other Off-site Transfers||Transfers Off-Site for Disposal or Other Releases||Total Transfers Off-site for Further Waste Management|
|1||CARLISLE POLYURETHANE SYSTEMS.140 SHELDON RD, BEREA OHIO 44017 (CUYAHOGA)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|2||CARPENTER CO ELKHART DIV.195 COUNTY RD 15, ELKHART INDIANA 46516 (ELKHART)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|3||CLEAN HARBORS DEER PARK LLC.2027 INDEPENDENCE PARKWAY SOUTH, LA PORTE TEXAS 77571 (HARRIS)||122||0||14||.||.||0||.||136|
|4||CLEAN HARBORS EL DORADO LLC.309 AMERICAN CIR UNION, EL DORADO ARKANSAS 71730 (UNION)||0||0||4||.||.||0||.||4|
|5||COVESTRO LLC.8500 W BAY RD MS-21, BAYTOWN TEXAS 77523 (CHAMBERS)||0||48,313||2,564||.||.||0||.||50,877|
|6||CYMER LLC DAYTON.411 MANUFACTURER'S RD, DAYTON TENNESSEE 37321 (RHEA)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|7||DEER PARK_TX (ROH).1900 TIDAL RD, DEER PARK TEXAS 77536 (HARRIS)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|8||DOW CHEMICAL CO FREEPORT FACILITY.2301 N BRAZOSPORT BLVD, FREEPORT TEXAS 77541 (BRAZORIA)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|9||DUOLINE TECHNOLOGIES INC..250 BLUEBIRD LN, GILMER TEXAS 75645 (UPSHUR)||0||0||0||.||.||0||2,000||2,000|
|10||E R CARPENTER LP.11002 CHOATE RD, PASADENA TEXAS 77507 (HARRIS)||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA|
|11||EVONIK CORP.3305 E 26TH ST, LOS ANGELES CALIFORNIA 90058 (LOS ANGELES)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|12||FILMTEC CORP.7200 OHMS LN, EDINA MINNESOTA 55439 (HENNEPIN)||0||0||124,697||.||122,775||0||.||124,697|
|13||KEMIRA CHEMICALS INC.1514 BUSHY PARK RD, GOOSE CREEK SOUTH CAROLINA 29445 (BERKELEY)||0||0||134||.||.||0||.||134|
|14||MPM SILICONES LLC.5700 CENTURY BLVD, TEXAS CITY TEXAS 77590 (GALVESTON)||0||0||202,500||.||.||0||.||202,500|
|15||PIEDMONT CHEMICAL INDUSTRIES I LLC.331 BURTON AVE, HIGH POINT NORTH CAROLINA 27262 (GUILFORD)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|16||PROVIRON INC.62 INDUSTRIAL PARK RD, FRIENDLY WEST VIRGINIA 26146 (TYLER)||250||0||0||.||.||0||.||250|
|17||ROYCE ASSOCIATES LP PASSAIC COLOR CHEMICAL CO DIV.28-36 PATERSON STREET, PATERSON NEW JERSEY 07501 (PASSAIC)||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA||NA|
|18||RUBICON LLC.9156 HIGHWAY 75, GEISMAR LOUISIANA 70734 (ASCENSION PARISH)||0||0||0||.||.||0||.||0|
|19||SABIC INNOVATIVE PLASTICS MT. VERNON LLC.1 LEXAN LN, MOUNT VERNON INDIANA 47620 (POSEY)||0||0||39||.||.||0||.||39|
|20||SOLVAY SPECIALTY POLYMERS USA LLC.50 AKRON DR, GREENVILLE SOUTH CAROLINA 29605 (GREENVILLE)||0||0||0||.||.||0||267||267|
|21||SPRUANCE PLANT.5401 JEFFERSON DAVIS HWY, NORTH CHESTERFIELD VIRGINIA 23234 (CHESTERFIELD)||0||6,789||559||.||.||0||.||7,348|
|22||SUEZ WTS SOLUTIONS USA INC..5951 CLEARWATER DR, MINNETONKA MINNESOTA 55343 (HENNEPIN)||169||2,617||14,062||15,345||12,276||0||.||32,472|
|23||THE DOW CHEMICAL CO - BEAUMONT ANILINE.5470 N TWIN CITY HWY, NEDERLAND TEXAS 77627 (JEFFERSON)||0||1,236||26,946||.||.||0||.||28,182|
|24||WEYLCHEM US INC..2114 LARRY JEFFERS RD, ELGIN SOUTH CAROLINA 29045 (KERSHAW)||0||0||49,520||.||.||0||.||49,520|
Back to top
View other report type:
On- and Off-site Releases
Quantities of TRI Chemicals in Waste (waste management)
Note: Reporting year (RY) 2021 is the most recent TRI data available. Facilities reporting to TRI were required to submit their data to EPA by July 1 for the previous calendar year's activities. TRI Explorer is using the National Analysis data set (released to the public in October 2022). This dataset includes revisions for the years 1988 to 2021 processed by EPA. Revisions submitted to EPA after this time are not reflected in TRI Explorer reports. TRI data may also be obtained through EPA Envirofacts.
Users of TRI information should be aware that TRI data reflect releases and other waste management activities of chemicals, not whether (or to what degree) the public has been exposed to those chemicals. TRI data, in conjunction with other information, can be used as a starting point in evaluating exposures that may result from releases and other waste management activities which involve toxic chemicals. The determination of potential risk depends upon many factors, including the toxicity of the chemical, the fate of the chemical, and the amount and duration of human or other exposure to the chemical after it is released.
Transfers to Recycling are Section 6.2, sum of Solvents/Organics Recovery (M20), Metals Recovery (M24), Other Reuse or Recovery (M26), Acid Regeneration (M28) and Transfer to Waste Broker - Recycling (M93)). Transfers to Energy Recovery are Section 6.2, sum of Energy Recovery (M56) and Transfer to Waste Broker - Energy Recovery (M92)). Transfers to Treatment are Section 6.2, sum of Solidification/Stabilization (M40, except for metals and metal compounds), Incineration/Thermal Treatment (M50), Incineration/Insignificant Fuel Value (M54), Wastewater Treatment (excluding POTWs) (M61, except for metals and metal compounds), Other Waste Treatment (M69) and Transfer to Waste Broker - Waste Treatment (M95)). Transfers to POTWs (non-metals) are Section 6.1 (except metals and metal compounds). Transfers to POTWs (metals and metal compounds) are Section 6.1 (metals and metal compounds only). Other off-site transfers are Section 6.2 sum of amounts with no code or invalid code.
This report ranks the 100 largest facilities reporting in a particular off-site waste transfer category (by default, the report ranks the top 100 facilities by total off-site waste transfers). By sorting on different off-site waste transfer categories (e.g., transfers to recycle, to energy recovery, to treatment, to POTWs, etc.), TRI Explorer will generate a report ranking the top 100 facilities for the specific off-site waste transfer category chosen. Note that the top 100 facilities ranked for a specific off-site waste transfer category will change as the category changes (i.e., the 100 facilities ranked for recycling is not necessarily the same 100 facilities for transfers to POTWs).
Note that if a facility name appears multiple times within the table above, the facility is a multi-establishment and submitted multiple forms for the chemical.
The facility may have reported multiple NAICS codes to TRI in the current reporting year. See the facility profile report by clicking on the facility name to see a list of all NAICS codes submitted to TRI for the current reporting year.
A decimal point, or "." denotes that the facility left that particular cell blank in its Form R submission (a zero in a cell denotes either that the facility reported "0" or "NA" in its Form R submission). "NA" in a cell denotes that the facility has submitted only Form A and thus the data for release, waste transfers or quantities of TRI chemicals in waste are not applicable. By submitting a Form A the facility has certified that its total annual reportable amount is less than 500 pounds, and that the facility does not manufacture, process, or otherwise use more than 1 million pounds of the toxic chemical.
The user selected list of chemicals applied in this report includes: 1,3-PhenylenediamineHow to cite TRI Explorer. Following APA Style, 6th edition, an appropriate citation to TRI Explorer is:
United States Environmental Protection Agency. (2023). TRI Explorer (2021 National Analysis Dataset (released October 2022)) [Internet database]. Retrieved from https://enviro.epa.gov/triexplorer/, (February 03, 2023).
Go to TRI Explorer Home |